The state of the game

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #10436
    Widiot
    • Posts: 80
    • Time to get a VIQI
    • ☆☆☆☆

    I see Castleford, Bradford and HKR are the latest teams to have the rug pulled from them by the RFL and their academies jibbed off.

    what a joke this sport is becoming.

    #10443
    James
    • Posts: 343
    • First Teamer
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆

    They can still run academies, they just won’t be elite ones.

    #10448
    sandgroper
    • Posts: 887
    • Captain
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

    I maybe daft but shouldn’t the game as a whole but looking to improve the pool of young players throughout the game? They won’t all be good enough for SL but they will swell the pool of quality players at whatever level they get to.

    As it stands we seem to be looking to reduce our top echelons and skills to a smaller and smaller number, presumably believing that all their academy players will be of sufficiently high quality to sustain the game as Sky funding diminishes.

    Sounds a bit like the expert who knows more and more about less and less, finally knowing everything about sod all.

    But surely we can all see that its about keeping the money tight amongst the few who already have more than the rest!

    We are losing the expansive game ideology and going in the opposite direction, or building up to an ‘us and them’ breakup, SL and the rest.

    Not good for the game at all imo.

    #10472
    Magnus
    • Posts: 26
    • South Stander
    • ☆☆☆

    Pardon the ignorance, but what is an ‘Elite’ Academy?

    #10525
    sandgroper
    • Posts: 887
    • Captain
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

    Pardon the ignorance, but what is an ‘Elite’ Academy?

    Its the standard of Academy thar we had, but we became non-SL. The SL/RFL brainstrust have decided who is competent to run an Elite academic. Those not competent can run their own sub standard Academy.

    I’m not sure what funding is provided, if any, but our funds were withdrawn on Admin and we can’t afford to fund an Academy atm.

    #10619
    RB
    • Posts: 57
    • Time to get a VIQI
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Pardon the ignorance, but what is an ‘Elite’ Academy?

    They are referring to a Category 1 Academy which clubs run with funding from Super League. Each Category 1 Academy receives £100,000 plus additional money dependent on set criteria such as how many Super League players the Academy produces. Widnes were due to receive an additional £72,000 based on our Academy performance when we went bust. This additional funding was subsequently not paid.

    You can also have a Category 3 Academy (Non-Elite) which is run in conjunction with a college. Warrington run a Category 3 Academy in conjunction with Priestley College (Warrington) in addition to their Category 1 Academy. Their is some educational funding for a Category 3 Academy but no funding from Super League or the RFL.

     

     

    #10637
    Frankg
    • Posts: 480
    • First Teamer
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆

    Pardon the ignorance, but what is an ‘Elite’ Academy?

    They are referring to a Category 1 Academy which clubs run with funding from Super League. Each Category 1 Academy receives £100,000 plus additional money dependent on set criteria such as how many Super League players the Academy produces. Widnes were due to receive an additional £72,000 based on our Academy performance when we went bust. This additional funding was subsequently not paid. You can also have a Category 3 Academy (Non-Elite) which is run in conjunction with a college. Warrington run a Category 3 Academy in conjunction with Priestley College (Warrington) in addition to their Category 1 Academy. Their is some educational funding for a Category 3 Academy but no funding from Super League or the RFL.

    There lies the reason for restricting the number of Academies. Nothing to do with any impact on the local community game, just about funding. What can the RFL afford to pay and could clubs complaining about not being given an Academy Elite licence (and £100,000 plus), still afford to run an Academy without that funding?

    If a SL club can afford to hand out player contracts of £100,000 plus, perhaps they could consider their priorities and invest in an Academy.

    #10638
    Spike Island 90
    • Posts: 345
    • First Teamer
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆

    The problem is multifaceted, there is narrative within rugby that in order to run some sort of youth pathway you need an expensively budgeted academy that provides education and is supplemented with three academy teams in the set up. In short, I don’t understand why academy cannot be part-time, give young players and opportunity to work and study, and instead of a staged process, why not just have one academy team from 16-19? Cut costs and reduces the need to raid huge numbers of players from the junior game.

    Overall, too many teams in RL rely on bailouts and transfers from the RFL. If central funding vanished, half the teams in lower leagues would and if SKY fully pulled out, at least 3 or 4 SL clubs would go into admin. It is the same with the academies, Salford pulled their academy so they could improve the first team. In many cases, the money is there for an academy, clubs just don’t want interrupt spending on the first team.

    #11190
    CJ91
    • Posts: 641
    • Captain
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

    See one of the architects of the state of the game, Nige Wood has been honoured!!

    The mind boggles…..

Back to Forum Home | Mark Topic Read  | 
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.