Ince for Widnes return ?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2368
    WidnesVikingsR.L.F.C
    • Posts: 1
    • New signing

    Ince could see a Widnes return as an unsettled feeling is present during his time at Leigh. Currently on loan at Oldham and rumoured to be coming back. Would you take him back after the way he left and would he get back into the team at the moment with Deon Cross in such fine form ?

    #2369
    chemic1950
    • Posts: 17
    • Kemik’s Assistant
    • ☆☆

    No and no!

    #2370
    CJ91
    • Posts: 488
    • First Teamer
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆

    Good try scorer, not a big improvement on Cross or Johnson, in fact I think that Johnson is far better- be a good option for competition- not a big prop or bench hooker, so a luxury we could do without, especially after Wembley.

    #2371
    Viking25
    • Posts: 175
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No chance.

    #2372
    Rafe Wrench
    • Posts: 96
    • Time to get a VIQI
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Yes defo

    #2373
    Glynn
    • Posts: 179
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    no dummy to large

    #2374
    Former ChemicFormer Chemic
    • Posts: 216
    • First Teamer
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆

    Two reasons for saying no: the way he behaved and I’m not convinced he regrets anything, and more importantly we need additional players but (big) forwards should be our priority.

    #2375
    ScouseViking55
    • Posts: 117
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Would be a waste of funds

    #2378
    Vinty the Great
    • Posts: 8
    • New signing

    If we can afford him, I’d take him tomorrow.  Never mind how badly he behaved,  what about how our top try scorer was treated by the last coach? Not even in the Wembley 19. If any young player ever had a reason for showing his arse, it was him. I expect stick from the people who think the club can’t do wrong, but players are human, not robots. If we need him and can afford him, what happened in the past, should he left in the past.

    #2380
    Ditton donkey
    • Posts: 311
    • First Teamer
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆

    Well if he on loan at Oldham, Leigh do not rate him, could reignite his career with us with Leigh paying the bill ?
    not a position we are poor in though, priority is the pack

    #2381
    The Ghost Of Ethel
    • Posts: 8
    • New signing

    Unless he has had a Harvey Howard style transformation during the off season then it’s a no from me.

    #2382
    MT
    • Posts: 167
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I’d stick with the wingers we have now (given we also have some cover in Hatton and Buckley) and spend any spare cash on strengthening the forwards. Nothing to do with what happened between Ince and the club in the past but simply don’t think wing is a priority position for signings.

    #2383
    Frankg
    • Posts: 386
    • First Teamer
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆

    Why? Our wingers have played well this season and I am not sure that Ince would improve the squad. He made his choice and left and we have replaced him with a better player. Good luck to him wherever he goes, but at the moment we don’t need him. We need a couple of decent props first to add to the squad.

    #2386
    sunny
    • Posts: 97
    • Time to get a VIQI
    • ☆☆☆☆

    I’d stick with the wingers we have now (given we also have some cover in Hatton and Buckley) and spend any spare cash on strengthening the forwards. Nothing to do with what happened between Ince and the club in the past but simply don’t think wing is a priority position for signings.

     

    Agreed. To my mind, both Johnson & Cross are better wingers than him and we have cover for them without increasing our salary spend by signing a new player.

    #2392
    Mick George
    • Posts: 142
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    A rumour that nobody has heard and will never happen. Sheens would not have someone with his attitude. Highly overrated IMO.

Back to Forum Home | Mark Topic Read  | 
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 27 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.