Right..quite a few happy with our business so far ...equally some are not ..that's fair enough were all here to vent ..
So let's look at it so far in possibly terms of outs Vs ins ...coz it seriously depends on how you look at thing's..
Is Kirk a better prop than Hatton...imo absolutely..
Is Reilly a better prop farnworth...debatable.. although past two years says yes ..
Is lyodd a better back rower than Davies or brown ...yes...is he better than a fully fit Grady .. again debatable...
And here's the killer ...is brooks ..who many have slated a better PROP than Lawton ...having seen brooks many many times I will say yes ...he's far better defensively n that's a fact ...he's not an enigma that is unstoppable one game and then disappears for 5 just a steady Eddie...but ultimately Adam is never a prop ..if argument was 2nd row Adam dicks on him ..no disrespect to Adam but he's not a prop ..
Right now for me the only position were weaker in is at 6...and it's blindingly obvious..you can't lose a craven ability and think Lyons is comparable..if we don't address that it's pure criminal ..no disrespect to Joe but currently and previously sammut has been on the market..ford has recently come on it ..meadows contract was up at batley ...all may now have gigs but they were there ...all light years more skill ..and add sooo much more ..
All about perspective and how you look at thing's ... argument for everything..
What I will say is of all the things mooted is butt makes no sense whatsoever...