Squad numbers

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #631
    sunny
    • Posts: 99
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No squad number yet for Dugdale or Robson?

    #632
    Steve McDonald
    • Posts: 76
    • Time to get a VIQI
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Robson?

    #636
    northstander
    • Posts: 14
    • Kemik’s Assistant
    • ☆☆

    Why no number 20 on squad list

    #637
    Blurred
    • Posts: 5
    • New signing

    Why no number 20 on squad list

    Number 20 was announced as Early Bird season ticket holders.

    #639
    Blurred
    • Posts: 5
    • New signing

    No squad number yet for Dugdale or Robson?

    Ellis Robson was on loan from Warrington last season.

    #643
    MT
    • Posts: 170
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I was surprised Dugdale didn’t get a squad number. It made me think Sheens wants to give him more experience in reserves or academy games rather than expose him to regular first team action.

    #654
    geoffw
    • Posts: 141
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I think Sheens is going to play all three of Craven, Lyons & Smith with Smith coming on at hooker to give Tomkins a break when needed. He may even switch Lyons & Smith around with Tomkins at 9. I think that could well work out well. If that is the case Dugdale would only come in if more than one of those 3 were injured Dugdale is still very young & needs more time in the academy to avoid burn out IMO.

    #657
    Ringo Bells
    • Posts: 15
    • Kemik’s Assistant
    • ☆☆

    I think you are right, it’s not a choice of Smith or Lyons at 7 with Craven at 6 and Tomkins at 9. Everything Sheens has said suggests he is going to have some rotation between the three of them and possibly also including Jack at FB. Could be interesting.

    #664
    Anotherposter
    • Posts: 138
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I think Sheens is going to play all three of Craven, Lyons & Smith with Smith coming on at hooker to give Tomkins a break when needed. He may even switch Lyons & Smith around with Tomkins at 9. I think that could well work out well. If that is the case Dugdale would only come in if more than one of those 3 were injured Dugdale is still very young & needs more time in the academy to avoid burn out IMO.

    Don’t be saying Smith at hooker or you’ll have all the geniuses laughing at you like they did with me when I mentioned it 😉

    #675
    DLM
    • Posts: 39
    • South Stander
    • ☆☆☆

    Owens went to Hooker on Sunday and Lyons to fullback.

    DLM

    #679
    Viking25
    • Posts: 175
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Owens went to Hooker on Sunday and Lyons to fullback.

    DLM

    Looked liked the same in the game against Toronto earlier today

    #680
    Geoff H
    • Posts: 1
    • New signing

    Which game against Toronto?

    #681
    CJ91
    • Posts: 489
    • First Teamer
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆

    Which game against Toronto?

    We played a training game against Toronto today….not full contact and with a mix of players by the looks of it….

    Surprised Brian McDermott came back considering the vicious booing his poor Toronto side got last time…..what a clown!!

    #687
    James
    • Posts: 232
    • First Teamer
    • ☆☆☆☆☆☆

    I’d imagine Dugdale will have a squad number soon enough.

    #733
    geoffw
    • Posts: 141
    • North Stander
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I am now totally confused. Else was given squad number 23 but in the squad for Sunday V Celtic Crusaders Dugdale is named as 23. It could be a mistake?

Back to Forum Home | Mark Topic Read  | 
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.